Pakistan's International Standing Under Imran Khan: From Client State to Sovereign Nation

guides

For decades, Pakistan was known internationally as a client state—a nation that followed the lead of more powerful countries, particularly the United States. Pakistani leaders sought American approval, accepted American conditions, and shaped their policies to serve American interests. Imran Khan transformed this dynamic fundamentally. Under his leadership, Pakistan began to speak with its own voice, pursue its own interests, and build relationships based on mutual respect rather than subservience. This foreign policy revolution was perhaps his greatest achievement—and the reason he was removed from power.

The Historical Context: Pakistan as America's Client

Understanding Khan's foreign policy requires understanding what came before. From the earliest days of the Cold War, Pakistan aligned itself with the United States:

SEATO and CENTO membership – Joining American-led military alliances in the 1950s
Partnership in the Soviet-Afghan War – Serving as America's frontline state in the 1980s
Sanctions and aid cycles – Repeated patterns of American pressure and Pakistani compliance
War on Terror partnership – Joining America's war after 9/11, with devastating consequences
Drone strikes and CIA operations – Allowing American violations of Pakistani sovereignty

The Cost of Client Status

This client relationship cost Pakistan dearly:

Over 80,000 Pakistani lives lost in the War on Terror
Billions in economic damage from terrorism and instability
Drone strikes killing Pakistani civilians without accountability
Humiliation at American hands – The Raymond Davis affair, the Abbottabad raid
Regional isolation – Poor relations with neighbors who distrusted America's ally

The pattern was consistent: Pakistan served American interests and paid the price. When Pakistan tried to pursue its own interests—as in developing relations with Iran or the Afghanistan peace process—it faced American pressure to conform.

The Mindset of Previous Leaders

Previous Pakistani leaders, both military and civilian, accepted client status as inevitable:

Military dictators sought American military aid and political support
Civilian politicians sought American approval for their governments
Both accepted American conditions as the price of power

The result was a foreign policy that served everyone's interests except Pakistan's.

Khan's Foreign Policy Vision: Friends, Not Masters

Imran Khan articulated a different vision for Pakistan's place in the world. The principle was simple but revolutionary: Pakistan would have friends, not masters. It would maintain relations with all countries, but subordinate its policies to no one.

The Core Principles

Khan's foreign policy was guided by several principles:

Sovereignty first – Pakistan's interests would determine policy, not foreign pressures
Mutual respect – Relationships based on equality, not dependence
Regional focus – Prioritizing relations with neighbors over distant powers
Economic diplomacy – Building relationships that served Pakistan's development
Principled positions – Supporting justice even when politically inconvenient
Independence from blocs – Not joining any alliance against any country

This was not isolationism—Khan sought active engagement with all nations. But engagement would be on equal terms, not as a subordinate.

The "Absolutely Not" Moment

The defining moment of Khan's foreign policy came in June 2021, when he told Axios that Pakistan would "absolutely not" allow CIA bases for operations in Afghanistan. This two-word response was unprecedented—no Pakistani leader had ever so publicly rejected an American demand.

The implications were enormous:

It asserted Pakistani sovereignty – Pakistan, not America, would decide what happened on Pakistani soil
It rejected the client-state model – Pakistan would no longer serve as a base for American wars
It protected Pakistan from retaliation – By refusing bases, Pakistan avoided becoming a target
It demonstrated political courage – Khan was willing to face American anger rather than compromise

American officials were reportedly stunned. They had expected the usual pattern: quiet negotiation, eventual agreement, some face-saving conditions. Khan broke the pattern decisively.

Relations with Major Powers

Khan's approach to major powers was balanced and independent. Rather than aligning with one bloc against another, he sought good relations with all while belonging to none.

Relations with the United States

Despite the "absolutely not" moment, Khan did not seek confrontation with America:

He acknowledged past cooperation – Recognizing areas where US-Pakistan relations had been beneficial
He sought economic cooperation – Trade and investment, not military dependency
He maintained diplomatic engagement – Working with American officials on shared interests
He refused anti-American rhetoric – Positioning Pakistan as independent, not hostile

The goal was not to replace American domination with hostility, but to replace domination with equality. Khan wanted a relationship based on mutual respect and shared interests, not one where Pakistan served American needs.

Relations with China

China remained Pakistan's closest partner, but Khan sought to deepen and broaden this relationship:

CPEC focus on industrialization – Moving beyond infrastructure to manufacturing
Agricultural cooperation – Learning from Chinese expertise
Technology transfer – Building Pakistani capabilities
Balanced trade – Addressing Pakistan's trade deficit with China
Investment attraction – Bringing Chinese companies to Pakistan

The China relationship was a foundation of Pakistan's foreign policy, but Khan ensured it served Pakistan's development needs, not just Chinese interests.

Relations with Russia

Perhaps the most significant shift under Khan was the improvement in relations with Russia:

Historic visit – Khan met President Putin in Moscow in February 2022
Energy cooperation – Discussing gas pipelines and energy supplies
Defense dialogue – Exploring military-technical cooperation
Trade expansion – Growing economic ties
Geopolitical significance – Breaking the Western monopoly on Pakistan's foreign relations

The timing of Khan's Moscow visit—with the Ukraine conflict beginning—was criticized by Western media. But the visit was planned long before the crisis and reflected a strategic decision to diversify Pakistan's relationships. No sovereign nation should limit its foreign relations to please one bloc.

Relations with the Muslim World

Khan positioned Pakistan as a voice for Muslim interests:

Support for Palestine – Consistently speaking against Israeli aggression
Support for Kashmir – Advocating for Kashmiri rights at international forums
Opposition to Islamophobia – Speaking at the UN against anti-Muslim hatred
Mediation offers – Offering to mediate between Muslim countries
Muslim unity advocacy – Calling for cooperation among Muslim nations

This role gave Pakistan influence and respect in the Muslim world that it had lacked under previous governments.

The Regional Approach: Neighbors First

Khan recognized that Pakistan's future was tied to its neighbors. His "neighbors first" policy prioritized regional relations over distant alliances.

Relations with Afghanistan

Khan's approach to Afghanistan was pragmatic:

Support for peace process – Advocating for political settlement
Engagement with all parties – Including the Taliban
Border management – Taking steps to secure the Durand Line
Trade facilitation – Seeking economic ties despite political challenges
Refugee policy – Advocating for dignified return of Afghan refugees

Critics accused Khan of being "pro-Taliban," misrepresenting his position. Khan was not pro-anyone—he was pro-peace and pro-Pakistan. His approach recognized that Afghanistan's stability was essential for Pakistan's security.

Relations with Iran

Khan maintained balanced relations with Iran:

Border cooperation – Working to secure the Pakistan-Iran border
Trade discussions – Exploring ways to increase bilateral trade
Energy projects – The Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline
Regional stability – Opposing war on Iran
Non-alignment – Not joining anti-Iran coalitions

This balanced approach protected Pakistan from being caught in Iran's conflicts with its adversaries. It preserved Pakistan's relations with Iran while maintaining ties with Iran's rivals.

Relations with Saudi Arabia and Gulf States

The Gulf relationship remained important:

Worker remittances – Millions of Pakistanis working in Gulf states
Investment potential – Gulf sovereign wealth funds
Religious significance – Saudi Arabia as home of Islam's holiest sites
Balanced approach – Maintaining ties while refusing to send troops to Yemen

The refusal to send troops to Yemen was significant. Previous governments would have acceded to Saudi requests. Khan prioritized Pakistan's interests over Saudi wishes.

Relations with India

Khan's approach to India combined peace overtures with principled positions on Kashmir:

Peace offers – Repeatedly stating that war was not an option
Kartarpur Corridor – Opening a visa-free passage for Sikh pilgrims
Kashmir advocacy – Speaking strongly after India's 2019 moves
Dialogue conditional – Willing to talk if India reversed its Kashmir actions

The Kartarpur Corridor was a significant confidence-building measure that demonstrated Pakistan's desire for peace. Khan's government built a state-of-the-art facility for Sikh pilgrims, winning praise from the international community.

The Stance on Palestine: Principled and Courageous

Khan's position on Palestine exemplified his principled approach to foreign policy. While Arab states were normalizing relations with Israel, Khan maintained Pakistan's long-standing position:

No recognition of Israel – Until a just solution for Palestinians
Support for two-state solution – Based on pre-1967 borders
Condemnation of Israeli aggression – Speaking against attacks on Gaza
Advocacy at international forums – Raising the issue at the UN
Humanitarian concern – Expressing solidarity with Palestinian suffering

This position was not popular with Western powers who wanted Pakistan to join the normalization bandwagon. It was not popular with Gulf states who had accepted normalization. But it was right—and Khan chose right over popular.

The Cost of Principle

Taking principled positions has costs:

Western pressure – Countries that support Palestine face criticism from Western powers
Economic consequences – Potential loss of trade and investment
Diplomatic isolation – Being outside the "mainstream" international consensus
Media criticism – Being portrayed as extremist or anti-Western

Khan accepted these costs because he believed that some things were more important than economic benefit or international approval. Supporting an oppressed people was not negotiable.

From Huzi's Heart

Imran Khan's foreign policy was not perfect—no policy is. But it represented a fundamental break from decades of subservience. For the first time, Pakistan had a leader who said "no" to the world's most powerful nation. Who built relationships with countries that previous governments ignored. Who took principled positions even when they cost something.

This foreign policy independence was Khan's greatest crime in the eyes of those who removed him. A Pakistan that says "absolutely not" to American demands is a Pakistan that cannot be controlled. A Pakistan that builds relations with Russia and maintains ties with Iran is a Pakistan that has options. A Pakistan that supports Palestine is a Pakistan with principles.

The client-state model serves those who benefit from Pakistani subservience—foreign powers, domestic elites, the military-industrial complex that profits from dependence. Khan threatened this model, and the model fought back. He was removed not because he failed, but because he succeeded too well.

Pakistan's foreign policy has returned to its old pattern. The current government seeks American approval, says nothing about Palestine, and has abandoned the independence that Khan championed. The difference between Khan and his successors could not be clearer.

Written by Huzi — from Pakistan, for sovereign foreign policy, for the independence they want erased.

🇵🇸 Stand With Palestine

Imran Khan's support for Palestine was not an occasional statement—it was a consistent position maintained throughout his time in office. When other Muslim leaders were meeting with Israeli officials and signing normalization agreements, Khan stood firm.

He understood that Palestine was not just a political issue but a moral one. A people displaced from their land, living under occupation, facing violence and oppression—they deserve the support of all who believe in justice.

Khan also understood that Pakistan's position on Palestine was part of its identity. A nation created in the name of Islam could not abandon the first qibla of the Muslims. A nation that faced its own struggles for self-determination could not deny that right to others.

Free Palestine. May Allah grant justice to the Palestinian people and hold accountable those who oppress them.

May Allah ease the suffering of Sudan. The humanitarian crisis in Sudan deserves our attention and our solidarity.

May Allah protect Iran from Western aggression. Khan's balanced approach to Iran protected Pakistan from being drawn into conflicts that would have been devastating for the entire region.